Southern States Secede
Secession
fever hit the South after Abraham Lincoln was elected president. The
South considered Lincoln's Republican party victory in the 1860
presidential election as a sign that the North was now going to end the
"peculiar institution" of slavery. For the South, the time of talk and
compromise had ended. In December, 1860 South Carolina became the first
state to secede from the Union. Secession of the rest of the states that
would make up the Confederate States of America occurred in two waves.
|
Doctor Samuel Alexander Mudd was the physician who treated assassin John Wilkes Booth’s broken left leg after Booth shot President Abraham Lincoln. Booth had broken his leg when he leapt onto the stage from the presidential box at Ford’s Theatre after shooting Lincoln in the back of his head. Booth then fled on horseback.
Early the next morning on April 15, 1865 Booth and David Herold, an accomplice in the assassination, had made their escape into Maryland where they called on Dr. Samuel Mudd to treat Booth’s broken leg. Mudd was an acquaintance of the well-known and popular actor Booth. Booth and Herold then stayed briefly at the Mudd house before continuing on in their escape to Virginia. John Wilkes Booth was eventually shot dead by pursuing Union soldiers in a Virginia barn.
Dr. Samuel Mudd was found guilty of conspiracy but was spared the hangman’s noose by one jury vote. Dr. Samuel Mudd was sentenced to life imprisonment at Fort Jefferson. Fort Jefferson, with sweltering conditions of heat and humidity, was a harsh place to be imprisoned, it being approximately 70 miles west of Key West, Florida in the Dry Tortugas. President Andrew Johnson pardoned Mudd in February, 1869 and on March 8, 1869 Dr. Samuel Mudd was freed from the prison. During Dr. Mudd’s time at Fort Jefferson he helped stop the spread of a yellow fever epidemic that had ravaged through the prison.
There has been continuing controversy about whether or not Dr. Samuel Mudd was involved in the assassination conspiracy, or was only a country doctor helping a man with a broken leg. Doctor Mudd’s guilt or innocence, in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln is still debated.
Dr. Samuel Mudd was absolved by President James Earl "Jimmy" Carter in 1979 of involvement in the conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. It is a curiosity that the former television anchorman Roger Mudd, is related to Dr. Samuel Mudd.
Suggested Posts to Learn More...
Comment from B. Nash
Time January 8, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Very good posting on Dr. Mudd. There is at least one scholar who believes Booth broke his leg falling off his horse after the assassination. Personally, I don’t buy that theory. At any rate, Dr. Mudd was truly guilty of conspiracy in the Lincoln affair. Yet, to some he is still the innocent physician who treated someone during the night-not knowing it was Booth. There is even a school in Maryland named after him. For a fun quiz regarding the Lincoln assassination try: http://abesblogcabin.org/category/lincolns-assassination
Comment from John C
Time June 28, 2011 at 12:58 AM
There is a mistake in the last paragraph. Dr. Mudd was not “absolved” by Jimmy Carter. Dr. Mudd was pardoned by President Andrew Johnson. Although Carter expressed his opinion that Mudd was not guilty of what he was charged, he recognized that there was nothing more that he could do. This is very, very different from what is stated in the web page.
Comment from Jonathan R. Allen
Time December 24, 2011 at 12:34 AM
To John C,
Very sorry for this VERY late reply.
In my research for this post, I found the term “absolved” used to describe Jimmy Carter’s action or opinion towards Dr. Mudd.
A definition of “absolve” is: Let off the hook. Synonyms for “absolve” are; clear, cleared, exculpated, exonerated, freed, justified, vindicated. I’m using an application named WordWeb as my source.
Although Carter was only expressing an opinion, I think he was basically saying that Dr. Mudd was pardoned, absolved, cleared, vindicated… and so on, of involvement in the Lincoln Assassination.
Perhaps the absolved/pardoned debate is only splitting hairs?
Comment from KatePawn
Time May 31, 2009 at 8:58 AM
I am very interested in this. Thank you